Forum Topics

GREG HANDS IS NOT WHAT HE APPEARS TO BE - BEWARE

Greg Hands is doing everything possible to be all things to all people. I believe the Hammersmith and Fulham voters are too smart to fall for his act.He plays Mr Liberal Centre Conservative.  Yet he is a member of the most right-wing Thatcherite association.  Visit - www.conwayfor.org - where you will see Greg is on the executive committee. Sharing the same principles as Tebbit, Parkinnson etc.  I think this is a wonderful organisation as it is anti-europe, pro smaller Government and pro privatisation. Greg does not talk of these priciples in any of his election literature - rather he hides from it.  Tebbit, Parkinson are legends - both against Europe. Modern day heros.Yet Greg will talk of defending the local post office.  This is a contradiction of his membership of Conservative Way Forward that believes, lobbies and advocates privatisation.  I would be proud if I was a member - not hide.Greg, the Conservative candidate for Hammersmith & Fulham, has issued an election leaflet highlighting the recent illness of Iain Coleman. The document tells voters that Mr Coleman was left with "slurred speech and problems walking" after suffering the stroke. It goes on to point out the Labour MP has not spoken or voted in Parliament since last May because of his condition. How can we accept this behaviour of our parliamentary candidate?American Conservative Union Chairman, David Keene, welcomed the English delegation and Greg Hands to CPAC in Washington, D.C. Speakers at the Conference included Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney; Senate Majority Leader, Tom Delay; Lt. Col. Oliver North, Wayne LaPierre, National Rifle Association; Asa Hutchinson, Undersecretary for Border and Transportation Security Designate;  Greg talks about crime yet when he was recently in the States (see list above)he spent time with the National Rifle Association who lobby for every American to own a gun. Above is a list of the right wing attendees. Scary list of Republican Politicians.  Is Greg confused?  Or does he think we should all have guns in Hammersmith and Fulham.Greg is a staunch right winger - which I would congratulated him on.  However, he plays a game - to hide his true self - with the voters and will be a different animal if elected.UKIP is the only genuine party fighting for H and F.

Giles Fisher ● 7836d3 Comments ● 7819d

CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL CLOSURE

Article in today's Observer newspaper:"One of Britain's most prestigious teaching hospitals is set to close as a result of huge debts created by more NHS patients being treated in private centres, as well as soaring building maintenance bills. Charing Cross hospital in west London would shut down and its services move to its sister hospital, the Hammersmith, but senior health officials will not discuss them publicly until after the election. Consultants at both hospitals were told of the plans last week, but were warned by their chief executive that it would be officially denied if the plans emerged in the run-up to polling day..." "Consultants were told at a meeting last week that the tower block which houses most of its services is set to be demolished .The site, in a prime site close to the Thames could be sold for a great deal to housing developers. Services would then move two miles north to the Hammersmith Hospital site, where new buildings would be needed for the expansion. It is even rumoured that Wormwood Scrubs prison, which occupies a large piece of ground alongside the Hammersmith hospital, may be sold off by the Home Office and that the Victorian building would be rebuilt to accommodate most of the Charing Cross wards and departments. The Home Office, however, has firmly denied any intention to sell off the prison. Last Monday, consultants at both hospitals were called into a meeting with Derek Smith, chief executive of the Trust. Smith, the highest paid executive within the NHS on a salary of £210,000, explained that they had to produce plans for a reconfiguration of services, because the costs of maintaining the status quo were too high. It would cost £100m simply to make the Charing Cross site completely safe - the ageing concrete and its system of air ducts makes meeting fire regulations difficult. On his desk Smith had architects' drawings, which suggested to those present that the plans were more than the beginnings of a proposal. A consultant who was at the meeting said: 'We were left in no doubt that closing the Charing Cross and rebuilding the Hammersmith was really the only realistic possibility. Derek explained that it couldn't be announced before an election; in fact he said that he would deny it if was put to him.' The doctors left with the understanding that the plans would be unveiled in June. There will then have to be a full-scale public consultation before any changes can be made. The trust has hit a number of financial difficulties over the past year. By the end of March, the official figure stood at just £5m in the red but some staff have been told that they need to make savings of around £25m this year. Last autumn, it had to start restricting admissions because the bodies holding the purse strings, the primary care trusts, were themselves in deficit. But many of their problems stem from a decision three years ago to buy Ravenscourt Park for £14m with the aim of tackling the long waiting lists for hip and knee operations across west London. The number of patients they predicted to use the service did not go there, and earlier this year it had to close one ward and just 40 of its 116 beds were being used. Several doctors think it is a good idea to move all the services onto one site. Professor Charles Coombes, head of cancer services, said: 'The real question is how you maximise the benefits for the patients of all the new treatments that are being developed. If you have one third of your cancer patients treated on one site, and two thirds on another site, it really is not ideal...' "But others are worried about whether services will be protected if the Charing Cross tower really does disappear. It is likely that as a major accident and emergency centre some kind of casualty cover would have to be maintained there. John Lister, of the health watchdog London Health Emergency, said: 'People in south-west London will be horrified by this proposal. There has been no open discussion, and we know that any hospital rebuilding always costs many millions more than the original predictions. 'We may be coming up to an election, but wouldn't this be a suitable time to discuss what kind of hospitals we want to see in the future?'

Mark Loveday ● 7850d8 Comments ● 7846d

Local Tory accused of 'dirty tricks'

Article from Evening Standard!Tory accused over 'dirty tricks' leaflet By Jason Beattie Political Correspondent, Evening Standard 10 February 2005 A Tory candidate was accused today of trying to smear a Labour MP who has fought back from a stroke. Greg Hands, the Conservative candidate for Hammersmith & Fulham, has issued an election leaflet highlighting the recent illness of Iain Coleman. The document tells voters that Mr Coleman was left with "slurred speech and problems walking" after suffering the stroke. It goes on to point out the Labour MP has not spoken or voted in Parliament since last May because of his condition. The row comes days after the Conservatives rounded on Labour for waging a "dirty tricks" campaign ahead of the general election. But Labour said Mr Hands's action showed the Conservatives were resorting to underhand techniques. One Labour official described the leaflet as the "lowest of the low". Mr Coleman, 47, had a stroke last July. Although he had temporary paralysis in one of his legs, he was back at work in September and is expected to make a full recovery. The MP, who had a majority of 2,015 over the Conservatives at the 2001 election, questioned his opponent's sincerity. He said: "I thought he [Hands] was being a bit snide. It is a very marginal seat and [the Conservatives] are going to fight a vigorous campaign. They say they want to fight a clean campaign and we will judge them on what they do." In the leaflet, distributed across the constituency, Mr Hands writes: "Local residents will have seen in the papers reports that the local MP has had a stroke. Due to his illness, the MP has not spoken or voted in Parliament since May 2004 and has made no known public appearances in Hammersmith & Fulham in the last eight months." Mr Hands adds: "We wish the MP all the best for a swift recovery and look forward to a vigorous campaign. "We need to make sure that all the issues like tax, the economy, the NHS and schools are properly debated." Speaking to the Evening Standard, Mr Hands expressed surprise his remarks had caused distress, saying: "The message was very clear that we were wishing him the best for a swift recovery. "This leaflet was put out weeks ago and the fact that there's a controversy bears all the hallmarks of a national Labour spin operation. Labour's complaint is a gross distortion. At no point was there any suggestion from me that political capital was being made from someone's illness." Labour accused the Conservatives of fighting the "dirtiest possible" personalised campaign. A party spokesman said: "They claim that Labour's questioning of Michael Howard's record as the minister who gave us the poll tax and three million unemployed, and who supported 15 per cent interest rates, is part of a dirty campaign. But when it comes to dirty campaigns, Michael Howard's Tories wrote the book."

Karen Cooper ● 7909d4 Comments ● 7867d