Forum Topics

"China's love affair with England" - Daily Telegraph on line today 14th November 2012

Please read the following fascinating article:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/9663863/Chinas-love-affair-with-England.html...."I was visiting Mr Tang, who worked in research and development at a large pharmaceutical company in Shanghai, at his weekend retreat in Thames Town. A facsimile of an English country town – all half-timbered mock-Tudor buildings, cobbled lanes and Georgian terraces – which lies at the end of the Shanghai Metro Line 9, 25 miles from the city, Thames Town is a part of Songjiang New City – a sprawling modern conurbation that includes seven university campuses and what is claimed to be the largest shopping mall in the world. [...] Thames Town was originally planned as a community of 10,000 people, providing housing for staff at the numerous universities of Songjiang New City and for Shanghai commuters, but properties were quickly snapped up by wealthy buyers as second homes or investments. Only a third of Thames Town’s residents live there permanently, Mr Tang told me. ‘Professionals. A few government officials…’ The rest, like Mr Tang himself, live in Shanghai or elsewhere, visiting only at weekends.A jovial man of 50, dressed in jeans and a combat shirt, Mr Tang told me that he had visited England on a business trip in 2001 and fallen in love with it. When the opportunity came up to buy an apartment in one of the low-rise blocks that encircle Thames Town’s centre, he jumped at it.‘I like to get away from the concrete jungle,’ he said. ‘Lots of people come here at the weekend to savour the atmosphere, so they don’t have to pay for a trip to London. For me it’s a place to relax, drink tea and have family reunions.’ "Message: perhaps we don't have to build any high-rise apartments blocks next to the river. Rich Chinese REALLY want low-rise "mock Tudor", etc....

Una Hodgkins ● 5073d0 Comments ● 5073d

Re: scaremongering over Hammersmith Bridge

Please consider our wrong-headed planning policies: covering over the ground and removing soil!!Although it is not Government policy we need to reverse or at least slow down the present policy of "build, build, build" in London. The infill and "improvement" of properties in London continues unabated and increases day by day the run-off of rain into sewers and the risk of flooding as rain is not allowed to soak into the ground locally as it used to be.The front garden which an owner-occupier concretes over to provide off-street parking and the excavated basement means less grass and less soil to absorb rain water.Multi-storey tower blocks have deep excavated foundations and concrete rafts to support the structure above, but less soil beneath to absorb the rain.The accelerating construction boom in London in the last 100 years has caused a very significant loss of (1) the natural soil surface and (2) the volume of soil underneath buildings to absorb rain water. The water table sinks, the rain water ends up in the drainage and river system, and the overall effect is to remove rain water from the natural environment where it belongs.Do we really want a parched and flooding Thames Valley? That is the direction in which we are heading.The National Trust has repeatedly published reports about poor water management in the UK. The most recent report from a coalition of environmental charities called "Blueprint for Water" which includes the NT and RSPB can be found here:  http://www.wcl.org.uk/docs/Blueprint_scorecard_pressrelease_6Nov12.pdfI note that "Blueprint for Water" does not have on its board any local authorities, district councils, the GLA or the urban planning profession, yet their planning decisions have an extremely important impact on water management. The problems in London are only the most acute form of the same disease.

Una Hodgkins ● 5073d0 Comments ● 5073d

Richmond Council to hold Referendum on Heathrow Expansion

Conservative-run Richmond Council is holding a referendum on the expansion of Heathrow Airport. It will be held before May next year and other west London councils will be encouraged to take part.The Council Leader, Councillor Nicholas True, said:“Richmond Council has again taken a united stance on an issue where people rightly expect us to put aside party bickering in local politics. We are all elected to fight for our residents - and there is no issue more important to them than this."I deeply regret that the nightmare vision of Heathrow expansion that had been so wisely laid to rest by our Coalition government has been resurrected. This time we must kill it off for good. As far as this Council is concerned it will be all-out war with the big money interests and slick-suited PR men peddling this foolish project. It is perfectly possible to deliver increased airport capacity in south-east England without expanding Heathrow. No-one in their right minds would consider building a new airport on the Heathrow site today - that must surely go for a new runway, too."Frankly, Richmond and other west London residents have had enough. They have patiently borne the scourge of Heathrow, with all the noise, pollution and risks, for decades. In 2010 they were given hope of permanent relief from expansion - they trusted the word of those who gave that promise and it should not be broken. "As their elected representatives we are not prepared to sit meekly and take incoming fire from the Heathrow lobby without giving our residents the chance to hit back and have their say. The proposed ballot will give the long-suffering people of west London an unprecedented opportunity to shout loud and clear to those that run the airport, and anyone inside government who may support them, that Londoners simply won’t take it. I hope that other boroughs will join us.”The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, added: “I warmly welcome the news of this ballot in Richmond. It is a positive step that people living in the vicinity of Heathrow and who would feel the impact of any expansion most acutely, are given an opportunity to have their opinions clearly heard. Londoners elected me on a platform of opposition to expansion at Heathrow and it is a mandate I am absolutely determined to defend. A third runway would mean more traffic, more noise, more pollution and a serious erosion in the quality of life for hundreds of thousands of people. We need to rule out this option once and for all and quickly take forward a bolder, longer term solution capable of supporting the needs of the capital, namely a new hub airport ideally to the east of London."Will Hammersmith and Fulham Council follow Richmond's example ?

David Giles ● 5116d1 Comments ● 5107d