Forum Topics

Closure of Charing Cross A&E - A good idea

Whilst I'm gutted about the loss of Central Middlesex which was one of the great hidden gems of West London I find it hard to be too bothered about the loss of A&E facilities at Charing Cross.Generally emergency facilities are widely abused by people in the country with much of their trade being in Friday, Saturday night drunks and people with non-emergency ailments who can't be bothered to book a GP appointment. If the latter have to travel a bit further to get to A&E they probably won't bother.Ambulance services are now better equipped than ever and paramedics better trained so a system in which you have fewer A&Es with better facilities makes perfect sense.The present Government has increased spending on the NHS in real terms and will continue to do so but because demand for services is ever increasing then savings have to be made somehow. Reducing A&Es seems less bad option. Staff costs are the biggest expenditure item and if doctors are going on strike at the suggestion that their pension entitlements might be reduced then services have to take a hit.Charing Cross is a great hospital but it never offered paediatric services any way so for many the A&E closure is irrelevant.Both H&F Council and local MP Andy Slaughter seem to be falling over each other in an effort to lead the campaign to 'save' Charing Cross. Neither of them will have any credibility unless they can come up with alternative ways the local NHS Trust can make the savings they need to.

Andy Jones ● 5214d10 Comments ● 5156d

Congratulations to Angie Bray MP for opposing the House of Hacks

by voting along with 90 other Conservative MP's and over 20 Labour MP's against Nick Cleggs' silly plans to replace the House of Lords by a new assembly 80% composed of members elected for a term of 15 years from lists of candidates selected by the hierarchies or headquarters of the political parties. People elected for a term of 15 years will not be accountable to the electorate. People selected by the hierarchies of the political parties will not be representative of or accountable to the electorate. They will be merely party hacks or apparatchiks. It will be the House of Hacks.The election of candidates from lists proposed by parties is reminiscent of  the "elections" held by Eastern European Communist regimes - not British democracy. It is a profoundly undemocratic and alien idea.Such an assembly will inevitably see itself as a rival to the democratically elected House of Commons. It will lead to disputes between the two houses, delays and compromises between the House of Commons and the House of Hacks on the other.And there is a high probability that the balance of power will be held  by small minority parties such as the Lib Dems or the Nationalists.And why do we want over 400 more professional politicans and all their associated costs and staff ? Can we afford them ?The US Senate only has 100 members.Many democratic countries work pefectly well with only one House of Parliament. Do we really need two ?Replacing the House of Lords is a very important constitutional issue. As such it should be subject to a referendum as was AV, joining the Common Market, introducing a London Mayor, the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly etc. If Scotland can have a referndum on independence, then the whole of the UK needs a referendum on replacing the House of Lords.Angie Bray has sacrificed her ministerial career for her principles.Well done Angie !

David Giles ● 5198d6 Comments ● 5176d